Sixteen articles on upgrades, .NET Core migration, hosting, and what Sitefinity actually costs to run — written by the team doing the work.
Upgrade when your information architecture and integrations still fit the business. Rebuild when content models, design system, and third-party dependencies have drifted far enough that migration work approaches the cost of a new build. Our lift-and-shift vs. rebuild article walks through the four signals we use to tell them apart.
Unsupported versions rarely fail loudly. The cost shows up as security patching you do yourself, workarounds that harden into custom code, and a roadmap that stalls because new features assume a version you are not on.
Usually it is marketing that feels it first, because the newer renderer is where Progress is shipping editor and personalization work. Teams that defer it end up maintaining two rendering models at once.
Most Sitefinity teams don't need an AI product comparison, they need a path. How native Sitefinity AI and assistant-side skills stack into one adoption journey.
The security, talent, integration, and velocity bills you're paying to stay on an old Sitefinity version, and why Long-Term Support is the right target.
Does Progress Sitefinity's built-in RAG hold up on real content? Our take on where it beats a custom build for content-heavy sites, and how to evaluate it.
Three ways to run Sitefinity: self-hosted, Sitefinity Cloud with Developer Extensions, and fully managed. How to pick by customization, operational load, and upgrades.
A framework for choosing AI search for Sitefinity: when ai12z, Progress Agentic RAG, or HawkSearch is the right fit for your content, governance, and budget.
Sitefinity upgrade planning: when an in-place upgrade is enough, when a lift and shift to the .NET Core renderer is right, and when a strategic rebuild is the actual answer.
What AI in Sitefinity actually looks like in production: content audits, translation sync, bulk updates, and editorial review on your live site.
A practical, mid-market DXP comparison of Sitefinity, Optimizely, and Sitecore on TCO, time to value, and marketer self-service. Get the framework to pick the right fit.
Splitting Sitefinity managed services and IT infrastructure between two vendors costs you performance, deployment speed, and budget. Why consolidating with one partner pays off.
Why mid-market CIOs running on .NET and Azure keep choosing Progress Sitefinity in 2026: stack fit, lower TCO, and a pragmatic AI and composable story.
A website isn't a project you complete. It's a living system. Here's what a Sitefinity support retainer actually covers, and why it matters before something goes wrong.
The .NET Core migration looks like a backend project. But the people with the most to gain are the marketers running the site. Here's why it's a marketing project.
A developer's case for Sitefinity Cloud — what self-managing actually costs, what changes on Cloud, and when staying self-managed is still the right call.
Two recent Progress awards confirm a pattern: Springthrough builds Sitefinity experiences that work long after launch, not just during the engagement.
Springthrough partnered with Coborn's to consolidate four websites into a unified Sitefinity Cloud platform with Instacart integration, cutting publishing times by 50%.
Springthrough has partnered with Bridgeline Digital to bring HawkSearch AI-powered search to Sitefinity eCommerce customers, enhancing product discovery and recommendations.
One email, twice a month. No vendor pitches.
Coming soon